Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sean s's avatar

Reading prior comments, it is clear there are good arguments for and against cultural interventions or support by governments. I have not given that much thought yet.

For me, the barrier was this: "Every action taken by a government is, no matter how well-intentioned, rooted in coercion: to do anything, governments use money obtained through the threat of physical violence. We almost never see it, that violence. Few people actually end up in prison for not paying their taxes. But the violence is there, and everything that it buys is a bit tainted by this foundational immorality."

In a libertarian culture, every action by anyone no matter how well-intentioned, is rooted in coercion. Property claims are rooted in coercion, as are all economic claims. Every assertion of individual liberty is "tainted by this foundational immorality".

In a libertarian culture, the sociopath is King.

Expand full comment
The Wiley Dad's avatar

"If people don’t want to use a certain language, support a particular media company, or pay for a particular film/festival/concert, they shouldn’t be forced to, indirectly, through their taxes."

If you bought stock in a movie theater company, do you expect to like every movie they show? Do you expect to have a say in every movie chosen to show? Or are you happy enough if they show a number of things you like and they do it economically? For instance, people buying tickets to shows you don't like are spreading the costs of that building, the nice sound system, etc. across a lot more people.

My point is that the libertarians you cite will not be able to micromanage that much if they are in a large community. Compromises will be made

I realize you are citing a pretty common libertarian attitude, but those folks are being too academic or pedantic to be successful

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts